“Of Modern Poetry.” Wallace Stevens. 20th C. How to Deconstruct Stevens’ Poem. A Manifesto of Modern Poetry.

***

The poem of the mind in the act of finding   

What will suffice. It has not always had   

To find: the scene was set; it repeated what   

Was in the script.

                               Then the theatre was changed   

To something else. Its past was a souvenir.

It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place.   

It has to face the men of the time and to meet   

The women of the time. It has to think about war   

And it has to find what will suffice. It has   

To construct a new stage. It has to be on that stage   

And, like an insatiable actor, slowly and

With meditation, speak words that in the ear,   

In the delicatest ear of the mind, repeat,

Exactly, that which it wants to hear, at the sound   

Of which, an invisible audience listens,

Not to the play, but to itself, expressed

In an emotion as of two people, as of two   

Emotions becoming one. The actor is

A metaphysician in the dark, twanging

An instrument, twanging a wiry string that gives   

Sounds passing through sudden rightnesses, wholly   

Containing the mind, below which it cannot descend,   

Beyond which it has no will to rise.

***

The poem begins with the assertion that modern poetry is not about static formula . It is the mind in a dynamic process (act) of discovering (finding) what is necessary (will suffice) for creating modern poetry with meaning for the modern age. It was not always dynamic (to find). Traditional poetry relied on formula (the scene was set). It didn’t have to invent new meanings; it [just] repeated what /Was in the script. In Line 4, Auden then uses *enjambment*1 to create an abrupt shift in both form and meaning.

Was in the script.

                               Then the theatre was changed   

Poetry changed to something else, and the past formulas became relics (souvenirs) of what used to be. This introduces the extended metaphor of the stage, which continues for the rest of the poem.

It has to be alive (living), not static, using everyday speech (the speech of the place), not contrived language, and represent (face, meet) men and women of the time, not preconceived notions of them. It has to confront realities (what will suffice), even if harsh (war). With the theatre changed, it has to construct a new stage, a new life-platform, and it has to be on that stage as an actor, constantly seeking meaning and relevance (insatiable), speaking deliberately and thoughtfully (slowly and/With meditation) into the most sensitive (delicatest) ear of the mind, must repeat exactly what the mind wants to hear, i.e., the honest and truthful state of its condition, listened to by a collective consciousness (invisible audience) that hears itself in the poem, expressed in a conjoined emotion (poet and audience?) as of two becoming one. The poet (actor) is a philosopher (metaphysician) who, in the darkness of the theater, twangs upon a wiry string, i.e., creates new sounds that directly (sudden rightnesses) encompass (containing) the mind, striving neither below nor above the rightness of the mind. Finally, with Stevens using another enjambment for emphasis, the poet must discover (finding) an accurate reality (satisfaction), a true simulation of life in its intricacies: a man skating, a woman dancing, a woman/ Combing. The poem of the act of the mind.

(Note: One of the criticisms of modern poetry is that, as it progressed, in some cases it became increasingly oblique. A much discussed example of this is with James Joyce’s novels: Portrait of an Artist is relatively accessible; Ulysses, with its prolonged stream of consciousness, is often found to be “difficult”; and Finnegans Wake, which, in all honesty, hardly anyone reads. Wallace falls somewhere along that spectrum in Of Modern Poetry. Word usage and metaphors are used to express what, admittedly, can hardly be expressed. This exegesis, for instance, can be re-interpreted in a number of ways [though, hopefully, with the same major intents], It’s a problematic issue.)

***

  1. Breaking a poetic line in half; splitting a sentence or phrase across two lines ↩︎

***

Subscribing only means that you will receive a notice when I publish a new post.

***

***

Scroll down for comments. **Remember that comments are public. Enter your Comment below.**

Leave a Reply

Discover more from How to sharpen our senses: perceptions, poetry, insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading